This is the last in a series of posts on my exploits measuring and squashing reliability woes in the Continuous Integration (CI) automation of the Azure Communication Services web UI library. Other posts in this series: chapter 1, chapter 2 and chapter 3.

This is the third in a series of posts on my exploits measuring and squashing reliability woes in the Continuous Integration (CI) automation of the Azure Communication Services web UI library. Other posts in this series: chapter 1, chapter 2 and conclusion.

This is the second in a series of posts on my exploits measuring and squashing reliability woes in the Continuous Integration (CI) automation of the Azure Communication Services web UI library. Other posts in this series: chapter 1, chapter 3 and conclusion.

This is the first in a series of posts on my exploits measuring and squashing reliability woes in the Continuous Integration (CI) automation of the Azure Communication Services web UI library. Other posts in this series: chapter 2, chapter 3 and conclusion.

The React runtime maintains a tree of Components that maps into the DOM element tree in the browser. External events, such as user interaction, cause Component props and state to change. React assimilates these changes in two steps. First, React recreates the Component tree by calling the Components’ render method1...